Skip to main content

Stickers on street signs can confuse self-driving cars, researchers show

street signs
Vicnt/123RF
Engineers developing autonomous cars certainly have their work cut out as they try to perfect the technology to make the safest vehicles possible, but it’s often the unexpected issues that pop up along the way that can leave them scratching their heads.

A few months ago, for example, it was revealed that bird poop had been causing havoc with the sensors on autonomous cars, with a direct hit obscuring their ability to “see,” making the vehicle about as safe as a human driver tootling along with their eyes closed. While Waymo has overcome the poop problem with the development of tiny water squirters and wipers that spring into action the moment the gloop hits the sensor, another issue has just reared its ugly head that clearly requires urgent attention if we’re ever to see self-driving technology rolled out in a meaningful way.

Interested in testing the all-important sensors that help a car to make sense of its surroundings and make decisions at speed, security researchers at the University of Washington recently tampered with a street sign — under lab conditions, of course — to see if it would confuse the technology.

It did.

The researchers said that by printing off some stickers and attaching them in a particular way to different street signs, the alterations were able to confuse cameras that are used by “most” autonomous vehicles, Car and Driver reported.

Rather worryingly, the team managed to confuse a self-driving car into thinking a regular “stop” sign was a 45-mph speed limit sign, simply by adding a few carefully placed stickers to it (pictured).

The sign alterations can be very small and go unnoticed by humans because the camera’s software is using an algorithm to understand the image, and interprets it in a profoundly different way to how a human does. So the sign used in the test clearly continues to show the word “stop,” despite the addition of the graffiti-like stickers that serve to trick the car into thinking it means something else.

The researchers suggest that if hackers are able to access the algorithm, they could use an image of the road sign to create a customized, slightly altered version capable of confusing the car’s camera.

The implications of such confusion aren’t hard to imagine. A self-driving car speeding through a stop sign that it mistook for a speed limit sign could put it in the path of an oncoming vehicle, though in such a scenario the self-driving tech in both cars should prevent a catastrophic collision. So, in such cases, tampering with street signs has the potential to cause huge amounts of chaos on the roads rather than anything more serious.

But what happens if the entire sign is fake having been put up by pranksters — something that does happen  from time to time. How will the driverless car be able to tell the difference between a fake sign and a genuine one? While the car’s mapping technology will add to its knowledge of its immediate surroundings, information on temporary signs for construction or incidents may have to be transmitted to driverless cars ahead of time to avoid issues. The technology could also take into account contextual information, prompting it to ignore, say, a (fake) 80 mph sign in a residential area.

Editors' Recommendations

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Is Tesla Full Self-Driving worth it?
A Tesla Model S is seen driving to the left.

While many electric cars offer advanced driver assistance tech these days, most of those boil down to a few different technologies working together -- like lane-keeping and adaptive cruise control. Generally, they work quite well. Together, they can essentially allow a car to drive itself on the highway under the right conditions. But companies are also working on the next generation of self-driving cars, and there's been no company more public about this than Tesla, which offers its Full Self-Driving tech.

But while Tesla Full Self-Driving is available to customers, it's far from free. At the time of this writing, Tesla offered Full Self-Driving through a one-time payment of a hefty $15,000, or as a $200-per-month subscription. Neither of those is cheap, and as such you might be wondering whether or not it's worth the money.

Read more
Apple’s rumored car could cost the same as a Tesla Model S
Apple Car rendering from Vanarama.

Rumors have been swirling around for years regarding Apple’s plans for an electric, self-driving car.

The latest report, which arrived on Tuesday via a usually reliable source, suggests Apple has scaled back its plan for an autonomous car, with some elements yet to be agreed upon.

Read more
Ford and VW close down Argo AI autonomous car unit
An Argo AI autonomous car on the road.

Autonomous-car specialist Argo AI is closing down after Ford and Volkswagen, Argo's main backers, ended support for the Pittsburgh-based company.

First reported by TechCrunch and later confirmed by the two auto giants, some of the 2,000 workers at Argo will transfer to Ford and Volkswagen, while others without an offer will receive a severance package. Argo’s technology is also set to end up in the possession of the two companies, though at this stage it’s not clear how it might be shared.

Read more