Supported by
Apple Is Said to Be Talking to Vehicle Technology Companies
Daisuke Wakabayashi and
Apple, which laid off dozens of employees from its secretive car project this month, is increasingly seeking help from outside companies with expertise in vehicles.
The tech giant has been talking with McLaren, the automaker known for its Formula One racecars, about an investment in the company, according to two people briefed on the talks who asked to remain anonymous because the discussions were confidential.
Apple is also in talks with Lit Motors, a San Francisco start-up that has developed an electric self-balancing motorcycle, about a potential acquisition, according to three people who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Apple has already hired several former Lit Motors engineers.
Even as many Silicon Valley companies, including Google, Tesla and Uber, have embarked on electric and driverless car initiatives, Apple has kept quiet. Yet internally, it has pursued a car project, called Project Titan, which has had ups and downs in leadership and direction. The layoffs at the project this month came after the appointment of an Apple veteran, Bob Mansfield, to take over the effort.
Inside Apple, employees recently described the company’s efforts to build a car as a project lacking vision and in complete disarray. The recent layoffs, followed by Apple’s pursuit of talent and expertise from outside companies, are part of the company’s effort to “reboot” the project, said people with knowledge of the layoffs.
Apple is trying to revise its approach to making a car at a time when technology companies are accelerating efforts to bring self-driving cars to the mainstream. This month, Uber started its pilot program for driverless cars in Pittsburgh, giving customers a chance to summon an autonomous Uber for the first time.
The self-driving car movement also gained a powerful ally this week: the government. Federal auto safety regulators on Monday issued guidelines outlining expectations for safety and how the technology could be used in cars.
Apple declined to comment, as did Lit Motors. Wayne Bruce, a spokesman for McLaren, said in an emailed statement that the company was “not in discussion with Apple in respect of any potential investment.”
But McLaren did not deny having had conversations with Apple. In a phone call, Mr. Bruce added: “The nature of our business means we regularly have conversations with all sorts of parties, but those conversations remain confidential. We’re not in a position to confirm or deny any previous conversation.”
The Financial Times earlier reported the talks with McLaren.
A partnership with McLaren would allow Apple to tap into the carmaker’s high-end automotive technology, forged by years of building Formula One racecars and selling sports cars topping $1 million.
For years, McLaren has been recognized as an innovator in automotive technology. As one example, the company pioneered the use of a single device to control a car’s engine, transmission and electrical systems.
McLaren also invented a simulator for designing and testing Formula One cars, a technology that it recently began marketing to mainstream automakers.
McLaren’s sales are steadily growing, but the company’s bet on research took a bite from its profit. In 2015, McLaren, which is backed by private shareholders, sold 1,654 cars, five more than the year before. Its profit slid 64 percent to about $7 million, from $19.4 million in 2014, in part because of increased spending on research.
Unlike a more traditional automaker, McLaren does not have a large car production business to protect and could tap Apple’s resources to make its technology available to the masses — if Apple decides to move forward with building its own automobile.
An acquisition of Lit Motors could also help Apple rethink its strategy with building an electric car and bring engineering talent into the company.
For years, Lit Motors has worked on the C-1, an electric motorcycle that relies on two large gyroscopes, which prevent it from tipping over. The two-wheeler was designed to have the efficiency of a bicycle and motorcycle but the safety of a car.
When Lit Motors announced the C-1 in 2012, it planned to sell the vehicle for $24,000. The start-up’s plans stalled after its chief executive, Daniel Kim, was involved in a motorcycle crash on a racetrack last year, rendering him immobile for six months.
Last month, Uber bolstered its autonomous car project with the acquisition of another San Francisco start-up, Otto, which was focused on self-driving trucks. Anthony Levandowski, the chief executive of Otto, who once worked on Google’s self-driving cars, is now heading Uber’s autonomous driving effort.
Mark Scott contributed reporting.
Driverless Cars and the Future of Transportation
News
Autonomous taxis have arrived in car-obsessed Los Angeles, the nation’s second most populous city. But some Angelenos aren’t ready to go driverless.
Cruise, the embattled self-driving car subsidiary of General Motors, said that it would eliminate roughly a quarter of its work force, as the company looked to rein in costs after an incident led California regulators to shut down its robot taxi operations.
Tesla, the world’s dominant maker of electric vehicles, recalled more than two million vehicles to address concerns from U.S. officials about Autopilot, the company’s self-driving software.
Read More
An Appetite for Destruction: A wave of lawsuits argue that Tesla’s Autopilot software is dangerously overhyped. What can its blind spots teach us about Elon Musk, the company’s erratic chief executive?
Along for the Ride: Here’s what New York Times reporters experienced during test rides in driverless cars operated by Tesla, Waymo and Cruise.
The Future of Transportation?: Driverless cars, once a Silicon Valley fantasy, have become a 24-hour-a-day reality in San Francisco. “The Daily” looked at the unique challenges of coexisting with cars that drive themselves.
Stressing Cities: In San Francisco and Austin, Texas, where passengers can hail autonomous taxis, the vehicles are starting to take a toll on city services, even slowing down emergency response times.
A Fast Rise and Fall: Cruise, a subsidiary of General Motors, wanted to grow fast. Now, the company faces safety concerns as it contends with angry regulators, anxious employees and skepticism about the viability of the business.
Advertisement