Skip to Main Content
PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Apple Must Face Suit Claiming App Store Is Monopoly

A federal court overturned an earlier dismissal of the case, which may be expanded to include all App Store purchases.

By Tom Brant
January 12, 2017
Best iPhone Apps of 2016

A class action lawsuit claiming that Apple's App Store is a monopoly can continue, a federal court ruled Thursday, reviving a case that seeks to recover damages from several years' worth of App Store purchases.

The suit, originally filed in 2011, argues that since iOS users can't download apps anywhere other than the App Store, it is effectively a monopoly that runs afoul of antitrust rules. The suit also took issue with the exclusive contract Apple initially had with AT&T for the iPhone and the $99 annual fee it charged developers for access to its SDK.

Thursday's ruling reverses the earlier decision of the District Court for the Eighth Circuit, which dismissed the suit based on Apple's argument that the plaintiffs lacked statutory standing. The case will now go back to the circuit court.

In his decision, Judge William Fletcher wrote that the court was unconvinced by Apple's argument that the App Store is akin to a shopping mall that leases physical space to stores.

"In the case before us, third-party developers of iPhone apps do not have their own 'stores,'" he wrote. "Indeed, part of the anti-competitive behavior alleged by Plaintiffs is that, far from allowing iPhone app developers to sell through their own 'stores,' Apple specifically forbids them to do so, instead requiring them to sell iPhone apps only through Apple's App Store."

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the court's decision.

Mark Rifkin, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, told Bloomberg that millions of consumers should be able to recover most of Apple's 30 percent take from App Store sales if the class action is successful. While the original class involved people who purchased apps from 2007 to 2013, Rifkin said that he may seek to expand the the class to include anyone who bought apps for iPhones to the present.

Apple Fan?

Sign up for our Weekly Apple Brief for the latest news, reviews, tips, and more delivered right to your inbox.

This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time.


Thanks for signing up!

Your subscription has been confirmed. Keep an eye on your inbox!

Sign up for other newsletters

TRENDING

About Tom Brant

Deputy Managing Editor

I’m the deputy managing editor of the hardware team at PCMag.com. Reading this during the day? Then you've caught me testing gear and editing reviews of laptops, desktop PCs, and tons of other personal tech. (Reading this at night? Then I’m probably dreaming about all those cool products.) I’ve covered the consumer tech world as an editor, reporter, and analyst since 2015.

I’ve evaluated the performance, value, and features of hundreds of personal tech devices and services, from laptops to Wi-Fi hotspots and everything in between. I’ve also covered the launches of dozens of groundbreaking technologies, from hyperloop test tracks in the desert to the latest silicon from Apple and Intel.

I've appeared on CBS News, in USA Today, and at many other outlets to offer analysis on breaking technology news.

Before I joined the tech-journalism ranks, I wrote on topics as diverse as Borneo's rain forests, Middle Eastern airlines, and Big Data's role in presidential elections. A graduate of Middlebury College, I also have a master's degree in journalism and French Studies from New York University.

Read Tom's full bio

Read the latest from Tom Brant