Apple surprised analysts by announcing lower-than-expected iPhone sales in its quarterly financial results this week. Is this just the latest chink in the armor of a firm that was once viewed as invincible?
No. Instead it’s important to view these results in perspective: Apple is still minting money, with net income of $11 billion on revenues of $52.9 billion, both of which are higher than a year earlier. And with almost 50.7 million iPhones sold in the quarter—basically flat compared to 51.2 million a year earlier—Apple’s phone business is hardly in disarray.
Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!
"*" indicates required fields
I’m amused to see reports suggest that this “shortfall” is due to customers waiting on an anticipated 10th anniversary iPhone this fall, and even Apple CEO Tim Cook got in on that convenient excuse during a post-earnings conference call. But that’s ridiculous: Apple’s mainstream customers aren’t that tuned-in to anything, let alone tech rumors. What we should all be doing here is applauding Apple for milking its iPhone 6 generation of products for three generations instead of the usual two and still driving such heady sales.
To that end, Cook correctly lauded the “continued robust demand for iPhone 7 Plus” in particular. Apple generated $12.5 billion in operating cash flow in and returned over $10 billion to investors in the quarter. Its total cash hoard is now $256.8 billion, a record.
That said, I understand why everyone is over-analyzing Apple: This is the biggest tech company in the world and its product launches, no matter how minor, generate incredible interest and, more important, enviable sales. But what I think is perhaps more relevant is Apple’s continued inability to augment iPhone with another blockbuster business. Its other products, successes all for sure, just can’t measure up to the impossibly high standards of the iPhone. This is the same problem Microsoft faced with Windows a few decades ago.
In Apple’s case, the “game changing” iPad was supposed to usher in the post-PC era and relegate Windows-based PCs to the dustbin of history. PC sales have absolutely fallen over these years—have in fact collapsed in many ways—but the culprit here is iPhone, not iPad. In fact, iPad sales have now fallen, year-over-year, for an astonishing three and a half years. This quarter, Apple sold 8.9 million iPads, down 13 percent from the 10.3 million units it sold in FQ2 2016 a year earlier.
Meanwhile, Mac sales were up, but just by 4 percent: Apple sold almost 4.2 million Macs in the quarter, compared to 4 million in the year-ago quarter. It looks like the new MacBook Pro hasn’t moved the needle much on Mac sales despite a years-long wait for a new model. And with 61.25 million PCs sold in the quarter, Mac accounted for just 6.85 percent of the market. Speaking of not moving the needle.
I’m sure there is a ton of nuance to evaluate here, including the ongoing growth of Apple’s services business and the lagging Apple Watch and Apple TV. But whatever. Apple is Apple, and it remains unique in the industry. And it will continue to be unique for the foreseeable future, no matter what you or I may think of the company, its products, or its strategy. Let’s not invent a narrative where there isn’t one.
Bats
<p>You know what? I am not an Apple fan. I used to be, when I was frustrated with Windows XP and saw how different, simple and easy to use a Powerbook was, but I came back to the Windows PC side, because of the hardware innovations from PC makers.</p><p>However, this article…is just so bitter and vile.</p><p>It's true. People were put off with buying the iPhone 7 because of the rumors of the 10th Anniversay iPhone 8. In my attempts to get people to switch from the iPhone to the superior Android Nexus and Pixel phones, I recommended to those iPhone loyalists to stay with their current iPhones and just wait for the 10th Anniversary edition. Because they trusted me, they did.</p><p>My analysis and recommendations are not something that I came to all by myself. Rather, it comes from reading and listening from various "trusted" sources throughout the internet. It's something Paul Thurrott, clearly does not do.</p><p>Boy, this guy is so bitter, dare I say "ignorant?" He says that the iPad was not a game changer, but it was!!! Paul Thurrott clearly does not understand that the iPad led to the Galaxies that led to the Surfaces. The same Surfaces that failed three times and took the 4th generation to actually be "good." Let's not forget, what Paul said a few years ago. The Surface was not a tablet (which it clearly was). Rather it was an ultraportable. I think Paul knew it was a tablet, but just towing the company narrative, so the Surface wouldn't be compared to the iPad at the time. I'm sorry, but to me, this phony slanted journalism is was undercuts any kind of credibility Paul has when it comes to technology. Let's not forget, the guy is a stay home blogger does know how the real world acts and behaves. The proof is to just look at his record of recommendations…which happen to be all wrong.</p><p>LOL…I can't believe that I actually have to defend Apple because of this post.</p>
Delmont
<blockquote><a href="#111376"><em>In reply to cyloncat:</em></a></blockquote><p>So many things are still open to massive change on the next iPhone, that I figured it might be better to give it a year to shake out before stepping on the upgrade treadmill again. Kind of a reverse Obsborne effect.</p><p><br></p><p>That's the stupidest thing I've read. What are you living in 2001 and waiting for the next Pentium III? </p>