Skip to Main Content
PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Apple Faces Supreme Court in App Store Monopoly Battle

On Monday, the court heard oral arguments in a long-standing legal battle over Apple's strict control of the iOS app ecosystem. Apple says it's merely maintaining a marketplace for apps, but critics claim it's practices are an antitrust violation.

By Michael Kan
November 26, 2018
Apple App Store

The Supreme Court is considering whether Apple's App Store is a monopoly and if consumers can sue the company over it.

On Monday, the court heard oral arguments in a long-standing legal battle that could shake up Apple's strict control over the iOS ecosystem. Currently, the App Store is the only official way to download apps for your iPhone or iPad. But in 2011, a group of consumers filed a class-action suit, alleging the model was an antitrust violation.

"Our assertion is that, with multiple sellers, multiple suppliers of the apps, we would be able to buy them [the apps] at a lower price," David Frederick, an attorney representing the consumers, told the high court, according to an official transcript.

Apple, however, wants the Supreme Court to dismiss the suit. Its argument: the company is merely providing a marketplace for the apps.

During oral arguments, the justices focused on how Apple extracts revenue from the App Store: With each sale, the company takes a 30 percent cut from the developer. Frederick claims this fee structure can cause consumers to overpay for their apps when there's nowhere else to buy them.

In its defense, Apple said the company plays no role in setting an app's price; that decision is up to the app's developer. "Consumers do not pay the 30 percent commission," the company's attorney, Daniel Wall, told the court.

However, a few of the justices expressed some skepticism with Apple's arguments. The plaintiffs "are claiming their injury is the suppression of a cheaper price," Justice Sonia Sotomayor told Wall.

Justice Elena Kagan also said that all app purchases occur through Apple, not through the developer. "I pay Apple directly with the credit card information that I've supplied to Apple. From my perspective, I've just engaged in a one-step transaction with Apple," she said.

Apple requested that the Supreme Court hear the case in 2017 after a lower federal court overturned an earlier attempt by the company to overturn the class-action lawsuit against it. If the Supreme Court rules against Apple, the company risks facing more antitrust lawsuits and the prospect of paying millions in damages.

The Apple App Store Turns 10
PCMag Logo The Apple App Store Turns 10

Apple Fan?

Sign up for our Weekly Apple Brief for the latest news, reviews, tips, and more delivered right to your inbox.

This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time.


Thanks for signing up!

Your subscription has been confirmed. Keep an eye on your inbox!

Sign up for other newsletters

TRENDING

About Michael Kan

Senior Reporter

I've been with PCMag since October 2017, covering a wide range of topics, including consumer electronics, cybersecurity, social media, networking, and gaming. Prior to working at PCMag, I was a foreign correspondent in Beijing for over five years, covering the tech scene in Asia.

Read Michael's full bio

Read the latest from Michael Kan