Microsoft to Make 100,000 Specialized HoloLens Devices for the U.S Army

Microsoft has reportedly won a huge $480 million contract with the U.S. Army. The company will be selling more than 100,00 HoloLens headsets to the Army as part of the new deal, according to Bloomberg.

The U.S Army reportedly held a bidding process for the new program, which is supposed to help its troops “increase lethality by enhancing the ability to detect, decide and engage before the enemy” at the battlefield. Microsoft was only one of the interested contractors, with other names like Magic Leap reportedly showing interest.

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The new contract will continue Microsoft’s relationship with the Department of Defense. The company could potentially be making specialized versions of the HoloLens for the U.S. Army. Bloomberg reports that the Army has requested features like night vision and thermal sensing, as well as being able to measure and detect signs like breathing and readiness.

The contract will require Microsoft to deliver 2,500 HoloLens devices within the first two years. “Augmented reality technology will provide troops with more and better information to make decisions. This new work extends our longstanding, trusted relationship with the Department of Defense to this new area,” a Microsoft spokesperson said.

It’s not clear whether Microsoft will be delivering the upcoming HoloLens v3, or just the original HoloLens as part of the new deal.

Microsoft’s new contract with the U.S. Army comes at a point where there’s been significant backlash from employees of the company against government contracts.

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 25 comments

  • AnOldAmigaUser

    Premium Member
    28 November, 2018 - 6:01 pm

    <p>No doubt this will help in the Minecraft Theater of Operations.</p>

  • bbold

    28 November, 2018 - 6:32 pm

    <p>Awesome news… Whatever keeps Microsoft innovating and making money, is good for all of us consumers, as well.</p><p><br></p>

    • SocialDanny123

      28 November, 2018 - 11:27 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#374386">In reply to bbold:</a></em></blockquote><p>It'll take many years before we see anything remotely consumer viable from any company. </p>

  • Dan

    28 November, 2018 - 7:38 pm

    <p>It’s interesting that MS employees have less of an issue supplying technology to the military than Google employees do. </p>

    • MikeGalos

      28 November, 2018 - 9:05 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#374400">In reply to Dan:</a></em></blockquote><p>Google's employees big complaint was about their company providing technology specifically designed to spy on Americans. The technology that a few Microsoft employees were objecting to was normal business software like Word being used by government agencies. Not exactly the same thing.</p>

  • skane2600

    28 November, 2018 - 8:16 pm

    <p>The great thing about providing tech equipment for DoD is that it doesn't necessarily have to actually work. </p>

    • skane2600

      28 November, 2018 - 11:07 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#374420">In reply to skane2600:</a></em></blockquote><p>I guess a lot of people aren't familiar with the many failed military projects that nevertheless were paid for with their taxes.</p>

      • MikeGalos

        29 November, 2018 - 12:55 am

        <blockquote><em><a href="#374514">In reply to skane2600:</a></em></blockquote><p>And the many that didn't fail. You know, like the computer network you're using to post your comments.</p>

        • skane2600

          29 November, 2018 - 1:38 am

          <blockquote><em><a href="#374550">In reply to MikeGalos:</a></em></blockquote><p>Well the point is that those projects that fail are funded just like those that succeed. And, of course, the network I'm using wouldn't have it's current capabilities if it was limited to what was achieved within US government projects or financial support. As you concluded with respect to markup languages, the origins of the Internet is also not quite as simple as it seems.</p>

    • Daishi

      Premium Member
      29 November, 2018 - 3:32 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#374420">In reply to skane2600:</a></em></blockquote><p>Well if the F-35 hasn’t been canceled there’s hope. Even for the Hololens </p>

      • skane2600

        01 December, 2018 - 2:34 am

        <blockquote><em><a href="#374592">In reply to Daishi:</a></em></blockquote><p>The fate of many defense products is based on politics rather than viability.</p>

  • MutualCore

    28 November, 2018 - 8:17 pm

    <p>Can't wait to see how Windows Weekly will spin this is a horrible thing.</p>

    • ChiWax

      28 November, 2018 - 8:31 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#374421"><em>In reply to MutualCore:</em></a><em> Leo will take the pacifist angle. MJ will take a 2004-era MS look at it. Paul will talk about Google Home/Mini etc.</em></blockquote><p><br></p>

      • MutualCore

        29 November, 2018 - 1:24 am

        <blockquote><em><a href="#374435">In reply to ChiWax:</a></em></blockquote><p>Yeah both Leo &amp; Paul are huge SJWs, hate the military. This is really good for Microsoft and Hololens fans, because the tech they will develop for the Army will trickle down to consumers too and it will be awesome.</p>

        • ChiWax

          29 November, 2018 - 8:50 pm

          <blockquote><a href="#374567"><em>In reply to MutualCore: I didn't say they hated anything or anyone</em></a>.</blockquote><p><br></p>

  • ChiWax

    28 November, 2018 - 8:28 pm

    <p>I love the V3 "commentary". Perfect Windows/MS reporting for 2018-19, as usual.</p>

  • MikeGalos

    28 November, 2018 - 10:32 pm

    <p>FYI: Typo on the first graph. 100,00 should be 100,000.</p><p><br></p>

  • LocalPCGuy

    29 November, 2018 - 12:09 am

    <p>Since Microsoft sells, but doesn't manufacture, Hololens, will they be made in China, I wonder?</p>

  • dontbe evil

    29 November, 2018 - 5:04 am

    <p>strange that they didn't use the amazing ios or android AR</p>

  • Tony Barrett

    29 November, 2018 - 6:33 am

    <p>I work in an industry where tech is supplied to the military. Believe me, whatever you give these guys has to be very strong, robust and idiot proof – everything the HoloLens isn't. The term 'you should be able to drive a tank over it' holds true. Sure, they won't be using these things on the battlefield, but I can see MS getting an awful lot of broken units returned! The HoloLens just looks fragile.</p>

    • MikeGalos

      29 November, 2018 - 9:39 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#374600">In reply to ghostrider:</a></em></blockquote><p>Notice it says "specialized HoloLens" not "consumer grade HoloLens". </p><p>Notice it says Microsoft won a bid to build a device meeting the bid requirements not that the Pentagon bought a bunch of retail product.</p><p><br></p><p>Seriously, if you work in a milspec industry you know better than to think you meet a military contract by slapping a label on a retail product.</p>

  • Pierre Masse

    29 November, 2018 - 12:00 pm

    <p>I hope they will have that kind of contracts with hospitals and surgeons as well.</p>

  • FalseAgent

    29 November, 2018 - 2:07 pm

    <p>why the fuck does the army need this though?</p>

    • Greg Green

      30 November, 2018 - 8:03 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#374910">In reply to FalseAgent:</a></em></blockquote><p>The army already has a lot of electronic gear with soldiers, this may add to the flow of information. Think of the FPS games with on screen displays or pilots with heads up displays. It could display how close the nearest soldiers or squads are, where enemy is reported to be, whether supporting arms are available, navigation cues, etc.</p><p><br></p><p>On the other hand it could just as easily result in information overload or augmented displays obscuring important friendly or enemy reality.</p><p><br></p><p>There'd also have to be some way of linking it to a particular combat soldier so an enemy couldn’t pull one off a dead or wounded soldier and use it against other soldiers.</p>

  • locust infested orchard inc

    08 December, 2018 - 6:21 pm

    <p>Ultimately, if HoloLens, when fully deployed to the US military, aids in reducing civilian death, then HoloLens will be heralded as the best asset a soldier can arm him/herself with.</p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC