HBO Max Is the New $200 iPhone

The days of carrier smartphone subsidies are long gone—but streaming subscriptions are filling the void.
Ann Sarnoff Chair  Chief Executive Officer of Warner Brothers
Warner Bros. CEO Ann Sarnoff announced HBO Max pricing earlier this week. AT&T wireless customers with unlimited plans will get it for free.Photograph: Presley Ann/WarnerMedia/Getty Images

It’s been a good month for freebies. This week, AT&T announced that its upcoming HBO Max streaming service—it’s HBO plus The Big Bang Theory and other catalog hits—would be free for its mobile subscribers and $15 for everyone else. About a week ago, Disney and Verizon partnered up, offering unlimited-plan customers a year of free Disney+. These sorts of add-ons aren’t entirely new; certain T-Mobile plans have scored you free Netflix for a couple of years now. Likewise Hulu and Sprint. But the latest wave of giveaways cements it: Subsidies are back! They’re just a lot more complicated.

It’s been long enough now to have faded a bit from memory, but you used to buy smartphones differently than you do today. Instead of paying in full upfront, or getting on an endless payment plan–upgrade carousel, you’d pay $200 for an iPhone or Samsung Galaxy, full stop. Less fancy phones you’d get for free. The actual devices cost every bit as much on paper, but carriers would eat a significant chunk of the bill in exchange for locking you into a two-year contract. It was the age of subsidies, and it was mostly fine.

A few years ago that dynamic began to shift. Contracts gradually disappeared, starting with T-Mobile but becoming the industry standard by the end of 2015. Carriers still managed to lock most customers in, but they did it by chopping up the full-freight fee into 24 one-month morsels. Instead of an $800 phone costing $200 once, it cost $33 a month over two years.

That means hardware has become a mostly level playing field, other than occasional promotions tied to switching from one carrier to another. But carriers still have to differentiate somehow. And the way they do so in 2019 is by dangling a streaming service to go along with your data plan. For AT&T in particular, the offers don’t even require sharing the wealth; it AT&T acquired DirecTV in 2015 and then Time Warner three years later. The bundles are coming from inside the house.

In one sense, the shift from hardware to service subsidies is a clear win for your wallet. No matter your carrier, you’re getting a bonus streaming subscription of some kind as long as you’re on an unlimited plan. But the bigger picture gets a little more murky.

Part of the problem is that carriers use these incentives to nudge people into more expensive plans. You generally have to be on unlimited data to reap the benefits, and in some cases a specific tier of unlimited. Verizon, for instance, bundles Apple Music indefinitely with its Play More Unlimited, Get More Unlimited, Beyond Unlimited and Above Unlimited plans but offers only six months free if you’re on Start Unlimited, Do More Unlimited, Go Unlimited, or the Verizon Plan Unlimited. (And yes, Verizon and other carriers somehow have multiple versions of “unlimited,” despite the seeming mathematical and ontological impossibility.) If you’re on one of those pricier plans but don’t want the bonus service or already have it elsewhere, in a sense you’re suddenly overpaying.

Which speaks to another issue with the handouts; it gets too complicated too quickly. You’d need a spirograph to draw the Venn diagram that plots out who’s eligible for free HBO Max. Not to mention redundant bundles; you can get Hulu from Sprint, sure, but it was also packaged with Spotify earlier this year. Or maybe you wanted to bundle it with Disney+ and ESPN+ for $13 a month directly through Disney. But wait, you could also be getting Disney+ free for a year with Verizon.

“It’s going to be confusing as hell for consumers,” says Gartner streaming analyst Eric Schmitt. And not just because of the choices you have, but what happens after you make them—especially if it’s a subscription you don’t want to pay for if and when the trial expires. “Remembering that it’s there, dealing with customer service, unwinding billing arrangements, all those things could lead the consumer to be pretty underwhelmed.”

And while the structures of these deals generally aren’t public, it’s not far-fetched to imagined that carriers can access some of the data related to your streaming that they wouldn’t otherwise have and use that to serve the all-consuming cloud of targeted ads that rips through the internet like The Nothing in The Neverending Story. (Sorry to report that in this scenario you’re Artax: sturdy and well-intentioned but ultimately enveloped by a bog of sadness over how much the future of TV looks like the very recent past.)

On the flip side, all of these bedfellows make it hard to tell which of these services people are actually watching. “There’s going to have to be a lot of attention paid to what are the real numbers here, what’s real? Just because they’re an AT&T premium subscriber that has access to HBO Max, have they ever used it? Have they used it more than once,” Schmitt says. “I think there’s going to be a whole lot of that going on.”

Free is good. Choice is good. This new era of subsidies offers both. But just like that $200 iPhone was always just a lure to hook you to an onerous contract, a year of free streaming has hidden costs as well. Which is fine—as long as you know what they are going in.


More Great WIRED Stories