Science and technology | Quantum computing

IBM challenges a recent result in quantum computing

Technically, they are right. Practically, it makes little difference

IT WAS HAILED by many, including The Economist, as a landmark result in quantum computing. In September a scientific paper appeared accidentally on a NASA webpage. In it a team of researchers at Google described how they had used a quantum computer to complete, in three minutes, a calculation that would have taken a classical machine 10,000 years to crunch through. This feat, they claimed, marked the first demonstration of “quantum supremacy”—using a quantum computer to tackle a task unfeasible for a classical one.

On October 23rd the paper reappeared, intentionally this time, in Nature. But a few days before that some researchers at IBM—which, like Google and several other information-technology firms, including Intel and Microsoft, is also conducting quantum-computing research—posted their own paper to arXiv, an online repository. In it, they cast doubt on Google’s claim.

This article appeared in the Science & technology section of the print edition under the headline "Not so fast"

To the last drop

From the November 2nd 2019 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Science and technology

Producing fake information is getting easier

But that’s not the whole story, when it comes to AI

Disinformation is on the rise. How does it work?

Understanding it will lead to better ways to fight it


Fighting disinformation gets harder, just when it matters most

Researchers and governments need to co-ordinate; tech companies need to open up