Skip to Main Content
PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

I Improved My Writing With Grammarly, and So Can You

The popular online writing tool catches more errors than any spellchecker, but you have to be a confident enough writer to know when to take its suggestions and when to ignore them.

By Jill Duffy
Updated June 21, 2022
(Image: Getty Images/Westend61)

The first time I tried the online writing tool Grammarly, I admit that I was mostly interested in uncovering its faults. I was caught off guard by what the app did well, though unsurprised (and hopefully not too smug) about where it came up short. That was in 2016. Grammarly has grown and improved since then, with new features that let you choose what kind of document you're writing and what type of audience will read it.

Grammarly is a writing app that benefits all kinds of writers, from non-native speakers to busy professionals. It helps you nip typos, errors, and poor word choices in the bud. Even experienced writers may find that sending their copy for a quick spin through Grammarly forces them to at least reconsider a few words and phrases they may have overlooked.


What Is Grammarly?

Grammarly analyzes writing and suggests improvements. Despite its name, Grammarly is much more than just a grammar checker. It looks for repetitive words, jargon, homonyms, and hackneyed phrases, as well as words that non-native speakers commonly misuse.

Even if you reject its suggestions, Grammarly forces you to pause and reconsider your word choices

There are two options for using Grammarly. The easiest way, although not the way I prefer, is to install an extension in Google Chrome and other apps so that Grammarly checks your work as you type. I don't like this option because the immediate feedback is distracting; plus I have privacy concerns about letting a plug-in read everything I write all the time. The second option—and this is the method I use—is to write your document in whatever writing app or word processor you typically use, and then paste your text into the Grammarly app. You can choose between a web app and a desktop app. This method works well for documents, but it's not as convenient for emails and other daily business communication where copying and pasting between programs would cost you time.


Take Grammarly for a Test Drive

When it's at its best, Grammarly identifies vague words such as "great," and suggests you swap them for more descriptive ones. It finds typos and offers corrections, which you can accept in one click. It underlines words you use with high frequency and recommends synonyms. Even if you reject its suggestions, Grammarly forces you to pause and reconsider your word choices, which is beneficial in itself.

A professional published piece of writing poured into the Grammarly app, with Grammarly offering poor suggestions for how to improve the writing

When Grammarly is at its worst, it suggests words that change the meaning of your sentences or deplete the effectiveness of reusing a word or phrase intentionally. My biggest disappointment came when Grammarly couldn't suss out the fact that "however" has more than one meaning, and it suggested I make a change that would have introduced an error. It can also be as fussy as an eighth-grader in an advanced composition course about comma usage. If only someone would tell Grammarly that most commas are discretionary.

Was I getting too cocky about my writing? Should I have been accepting more of Grammarly's suggestions? Second-guessing myself wasn't making anything better.


Analysis of Professional, Polished Writing

Out of curiosity and to give myself a sanity check, I copied and pasted into Grammarly a creative nonfiction essay published in The Paris Review. At the time of its publication, this piece had garnered all kinds of attention and praise. What would Grammarly think of it?

Grammarly is better at catching dumb mistakes than making something shine

I set some goals for the piece, calling it casual and for a general audience. The analysis of this pro's work was more of the same. Grammarly thought the word "character" could be changed to "style" even though the author was referring to a fictional person in this instance. The app wanted "Tell me I look nice" to be "Tell me, I look nice," stripping away all of its power as a command. Could we get a few more commas? Grammarly sure thought so.

In short, you have to be confident about what you ignore from Grammarly. It's better at catching dumb mistakes than making something shine.


Technology's Understanding of Language

When I first learned about Grammarly, I got in touch with a computational linguist who works there, Mariana Romanyshyn. We talked by video conference back in 2016 about how hard it is for computers to parse language and what Grammarly is doing to make computing systems better at it.

"Language is very ambiguous," she said. "It's not always possible for a machine to detect even what part of speech a word is." She said Grammarly sometimes makes incorrect suggestions and misses errors because of limitations with part-of-speech taggers. "This ambiguity is a really tricky task for computers to solve."

I asked her for some examples. "There's this classic linguistic sentence: The old man the boat. The word 'man' is the verb." In other words, it means, "those who are old are the ones who man the boat."

"An automatic language processing system would never be able to detect that," Romanyshyn said. Machines will always assume that "man" is a noun in this context. Another example of a sentence that always tricks computers is one well known to linguists: "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo." It is a grammatically correct sentence. Please puzzle over it for a moment before reading about how to parse it.

As far as privacy goes, be careful what you feed into Grammarly, as the company could conceivably see everything it analyzes. PCMag reviewer Ben Moore addresses this topic in detail in his review of Grammarly.


Grammarly Makes (Bad) Writing Better

Since my first experience with the app, I've used it for a few writing assignments when an editor required that I submit a Grammarly report alongside my copy. Another writing team I worked with gave all its writers a hearty nudge to use the app to catch and correct the kinds of writing faux pas that made one cranky editor crankier.

When I'm on a deadline and have only written the first draft, Grammarly does the boring work of finding and bringing to my attention errors, typos, and needless repetition. It's a handy productivity hack. As I mentioned earlier, though, the suggestions are only beneficial when I can confidently throw away the bad ones. 

Grammarly isn't cheap, either. The free version is limited, and Premium plans cost $30 per month, $60 per quarter, or $144 per year. But when you're on deadline with an important piece of writing that you know could be better, it may be money well spent.

Many people need help with their writing, sometimes in high-stakes scenarios. Job seekers working on cover letters only get one chance to make a first impression. Students may find that bad writing makes the difference between passing and failing. And business professionals putting together presentations that make or break their quarter can always use some help. Practically everyone has a vested interest in writing as clearly and as well as they can, and Grammarly can help, if you know enough to take its best suggestions and discard its worst.

Like What You're Reading?

Sign up for Tips & Tricks newsletter for expert advice to get the most out of your technology.

This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time.


Thanks for signing up!

Your subscription has been confirmed. Keep an eye on your inbox!

Sign up for other newsletters

Table of Contents

TRENDING

About Jill Duffy

Columnist and Deputy Managing Editor, Software

I've been contributing to PCMag since 2011 and am currently the deputy managing editor for the software team. My column, Get Organized, has been running on PCMag since 2012. It gives advice on how to manage all the devices, apps, digital photos, email, and other technology that can make you feel like you're going to have a panic attack.

My latest book is The Everything Guide to Remote Work, which goes into great detail about a subject that I've been covering as a writer and participating in personally since well before the COVID-19 pandemic.

I specialize in apps for productivity and collaboration, including project management software. I also test and analyze online learning services, particularly for learning languages.

Prior to working for PCMag, I was the managing editor of Game Developer magazine. I've also worked at the Association for Computing Machinery, The Examiner newspaper in San Francisco, and The American Institute of Physics. I was once profiled in an article in Vogue India alongside Marie Kondo.

Follow me on Mastodon.

Read Jill's full bio

Read the latest from Jill Duffy