Intel’s storage czar has a thing or two to say about the future of drive technology, naturally, but it’s not all party line. PCWorld recently sat down with Bill Leszinske, who heads Intel’s NVM (non-volatile memory) Solutions Group, to get his take on interfaces, hard drives vs. solid-state drives, and when storage and RAM will merge.
SATA Express who?
Remember the SATA Express port? It arose in 2013, intended as an evolution of the slower SATA interface. While some systems began supporting the interface, however, drives for it never appeared—at least none we’ve ever seen. SSD performance also quickly eclipsed the capabilities of SATA Express.
dsimic/Wikipedia
Don’t expect to ever plug an Intel SSD into that SATA Express port on your Z87 motherboard.
SATA Express may never officially have been declared dead, but to Intel’s drive division, at least, it is. “I’m not planning to offer SSDs in SATA Express,” Leszinske said of the neglected interface. “I don’t need another form factor or interface. It just complicates the product line.”
Die, hard drive, die!
Much has also been predicted about when SSDs would supplant hard drives, but when you look at a $50, 1TB hard drive versus a $250, 1TB SSD, it doesn’t seem like we’re remotely close. Despite that gap, Leszinske said he believes an inflection point is imminent.
“There are some people who want large drives and will continue to buy them,” Leszinske said. On the other hand, he pointed to research showing that the vast majority of people use less than 40 percent of their drive’s capacity.
ChrisPole / iStock You can put your hard drive on ice pretty soon, Intel predicts.
Hard drives will continue to be cheaper per GB than SSDs, but Leszinske thinks SSD prices will fall enough to convert more people. “When you can get a 256GB SSD that costs the same as a hard drive, call that $40-ish U.S. dollars, I think it’s done.”
Leszinske thinks many users will give up capacity for speed. “I think it just transitions because it’s good enough storage, it’s enough capacity,” he said. “Are we within a year of that? Probably.”
Leszinske admits his bias—“I’m an SSD guy”—but he’s not far off-trend. A spot-check of prices on the Internet puts most name-brand 256GB SSDs in the $75 range, so $40-“ish” is within sight.
Intel believes PCIe drives will soon reach parity with SATA SSDs.
Even more aggressive is Leszinske’s belief that SATA SSDs will soon be passe. He believes most consumers building or buying desktops will soon move to PCIe-based drives. Leszinske predicted the price barrier would fall quickly. “As we head into the later parts of 2017, PCIe and SATA pricing get much closer,” he said.
Performance plays a role, too. Today’s SATA-based SSDs are limited to data throughput of 600Mbps. Moving to PCIe, M.2, or U.2 (formerly SFF-8639) removes the handcuffs and could quadruple that interface speed, or better.
Of course, Intel has a vested interest in this outcome. “Moving storage to PCIe in client and data center helps keep larger amounts of data closer to the CPU, which means people get a better experience, which means they buy higher-end processors, which is good for Intel’s overall business,” Leszinske explained.
Intel Intel’s Optane technology promises “1,000 times” the gate performance of an SSD. But how will it work in your PC?
Optane will work with your PC
Leszinske also outlined how Intel’s Optane, or 3D XPoint, technology could be used when introduced. It’s a little hard to wrap your brain around Optane, but it’s essentially a storage device with gate performance that’s 1,000 times faster (according to Intel and Micron) than today’s NAND.
Leszinske dispelled rumors that users would be forced to buy new systems to run Optane—such as in purportedly leaked slides of Intel’s upcoming Kaby Lake processor, which show “support for Optane.” He said Optane drives will first be offered in PCIe, so pretty much anyone with a slot and system bandwidth to spare should be able to run it.
Perhaps more intriguing, though, is Optane in a DDR4 memory slot. Remember, Optane is “storage,” but it’s so fast that it approaches the speed of RAM. Intel even announced at IDF last year that it was planning to add extensions to an upcoming Xeon so it could directly work with Optane drives through a system’s DDR4. That set off concerns in the industry that Intel was going to kick off another memory standards war.
A future Xeon will support using an Optane device in a DDR4 memory slot.
While we didn’t discuss the political battles, Leszinske did address why the CPU needs a change to work with Optane in a RAM slot. “We had to modify the DDR4 electrical interface because you have to be able to communicate that [the drive] is a persistent device versus existing things [e.g, RAM],” he said.
Leszinske added that it was no picnic to build in the new capabilities. ”It took a lot of work to build 3DXpoint. Build the controller, build the DIMM, modify the interface so that it knew it was persistent, to the memory controller in the CPU, to instructions that we had to add. It’s been a multi-year process to get that going.”
Still, there is somewhat of a competing standard already in place already called NVDIMM, or Non-Volatile DIMM—essentially persistent memory devices that don’t lose data when power is cut off. HP Enterprise recently announced its first product with NVDIMMs.
HPE HPE’s NVDIMM module has DRAM chips and multiplexors on the front, connected to NAND flash chips on the back.
Leszinke’s preference wasn’t a surprise. ”I think NVDIMM will solve certain workloads, but they’re not a great solution in the sense that it’s usually a combo DRAM-plus-NAND thing,” he said, continuing: “It’s battery backed-up, which makes it expensive. It’s not as, I’ll call it, an elegant solution.”
Even more interesting about Optane are the implications for the newfangled technology. Today, your PC might have 8GB or 16GB of memory. What if you had a 2TB or 4TB Optane device in a DDR4 slot that was 1,000 times the speed of an SSD?
Leszinske looked ahead to a time when storage and RAM would merge. “The fact that we have something called memory and the fact that we have something called storage is really an artifact of the technology,” Leszinske said. “Ideally you’d just have a big pool of your stuff.” It’s still too soon to know how this more flexible vision of storage will affect future PCs, but Leszinske likely knows more than he was willing to say. “There’s a lot of smart people doing a lot of reimagining what a computer can look like.”